Skip to content

Free for nonprofits, NGOs, think tanks, and institutes. Grant funded by James Scott, administered by the Embassy Row Project.

ArtOfTheHack home

KRYOS-XS Console / Service 06

Access and Entitlement Review

Identify unnecessary, outdated or unusually powerful access and recommend what should change.

What this service does

The problem, the evidence, and what stays with you

The problem addressed

Access accumulates through groups, roles, shared drives and departed staff until nobody can say what a single account can actually reach.

Authorized information required

Group memberships, organizational roles, administrator privileges, third-party and partner access and dormant entitlements.

The intelligence layer ArtOfTheHack adds

Inherited and nested access is traced to the effective entitlement, then compared with current responsibilities and last use.

The decision value you receive

Retain, reduce, time-bound, transfer or revoke recommendations carrying the evidence of need and the impact of removal.

What remains under your control

The named manager or data owner certifies every decision, and effective access is re-read after the approved change.

Workflow

The six-stage governed sequence

Nothing in this sequence is skipped. Evidence precedes inference, authority precedes action, and verification precedes assurance.

  1. Stage 01

    Inventory

    Group memberships, organizational roles and administrator privileges are collected.

    Output feeds stage 02: Trace

  2. Stage 02

    Trace

    Third-party and partner access is resolved to the effective entitlement it grants.

    Output feeds stage 03: Compare

  3. Stage 03

    Compare

    Dormant entitlements and access inconsistent with current responsibilities are identified.

    Output feeds stage 04: Evaluate

  4. Stage 04

    Evaluate

    Potential impact of retaining or removing each entitlement is estimated.

    Output feeds stage 05: Certify

  5. Stage 05

    Certify

    The named manager or data owner reviews and approves each recommendation.

    Output feeds stage 06: Verify

  6. Stage 06

    Verify

    Effective access is re-read after the approved change and the review recorded.

    Closes the sequence and returns evidence to the decision record

Hard boundary

Only access exposed by a connected system can be reviewed. Access held on platforms without a supported API is stated as a coverage gap.

Evidence in

What the workflow reads

  • Group memberships
  • Organizational roles
  • Administrator privileges
  • Third-party access
  • Partner access
  • Dormant entitlements
  • Access inconsistent with current responsibilities

Decision out

What the workflow returns

  • Retain, reduce, time-bound, transfer or revoke
  • Evidence of need
  • Potential impact
  • Required approver
  • Verified outcome

Authority and action

Who decides, who acts, how it is verified

Service posture
Advisory with approval-gated action
Acting API
Directory, Workspace group and connected SaaS entitlement APIs.
Approving authority
The named manager, data owner or application owner who certifies the review.
Verification
Effective access is re-read after the change and the review is scheduled to recur.
Rollback and reversal
The prior entitlement state and the reviewer rationale are retained, so a removal can be reinstated.

Connection

What must be authorized

  • Google Workspace directory and group evidence
  • Identity provider or SaaS entitlement APIs where connected
Delivery
Authorized API integration, webhooks, or structured evidence submissions. No endpoint agent, no appliance, no product replacement.
System of record
The connected source platform remains the system of record and the point of enforcement. ArtOfTheHack proposes; the source system acts.
Cost to the grantee
KRYOS-XS is provided at no cost to eligible nonprofits under a grant funded by James Scott and administered by the Embassy Row Project.
  • Read-only advisory operation by default
  • Human approval for high-impact actions
  • Least-privilege, revocable permissions
  • Explicit blind spots instead of assumed facts
  • Reversible enforcement wherever technically available