KRYOS-XS Console / Service 04
Alert Triage and Incident Adjudication
Consolidate security alerts into a prioritized decision queue and connect related events so the broader situation is evaluated.
What this service does
The problem, the evidence, and what stays with you
The problem addressed
Alerts arrive faster than a small team can read them, and reviewing each one in isolation hides the situation the alerts collectively describe.
Authorized information required
Security alerts from connected systems, the related events around them, affected users and systems, and the age and source of each fact.
The intelligence layer ArtOfTheHack adds
Related events are connected, contradictory evidence is sought, likelihood and impact are estimated and organizational policy is applied before priority is assigned.
The decision value you receive
One prioritized queue where each item states its owner, severity, confidence, missing information, recommended action, approver and deadline.
What remains under your control
The source platform stays the system of record; KRYOS organizes and adjudicates what it reports and never claims evidence it cannot see.
Workflow
The six-stage governed sequence
Nothing in this sequence is skipped. Evidence precedes inference, authority precedes action, and verification precedes assurance.
Stage 01
Consolidate
Relevant Google Workspace security alerts are gathered into one queue.
Output feeds stage 02: Relate
Stage 02
Relate
Related events are connected so isolated alerts are not reviewed individually.
Output feeds stage 03: Cross-check
Stage 03
Cross-check
Evidence source and age are verified and contradictory evidence is sought.
Output feeds stage 04: Prioritize
Stage 04
Prioritize
Likelihood and potential impact are estimated and organizational policy applied.
Output feeds stage 05: Assign
Stage 05
Assign
An owner, required approver, severity, deadline and recommended action are set.
Output feeds stage 06: Verify
Stage 06
Verify
The outcome is confirmed and the decision preserved in the Decision Ledger.
Closes the sequence and returns evidence to the decision record
Hard boundary
KRYOS does not create raw telemetry and does not detect. It organizes and adjudicates what connected systems already report.
Evidence in
What the workflow reads
- Workspace security alerts
- Related events
- Affected users and systems
- Evidence source and age
- Organizational policy
Decision out
What the workflow returns
- Priority
- Owner
- Severity
- Confidence
- Missing information
- Recommended action
- Required approver
- Deadline
- Current status
Authority and action
Who decides, who acts, how it is verified
- Service posture
- Advisory with approval-gated action
- Acting API
- The originating platform API, used for write-back only where one exists.
- Approving authority
- The decision owner named on the governed decision, within the assigned deadline.
- Verification
- The verdict, action and analyst feedback are preserved and compared with the outcome.
- Rollback and reversal
- Suppressions carry an expiry and write-back is reversible in the source console.
Connection
What must be authorized
- Google Workspace alert evidence
- Optional SIEM alert feed where an API exists
- Delivery
- Authorized API integration, webhooks, or structured evidence submissions. No endpoint agent, no appliance, no product replacement.
- System of record
- The connected source platform remains the system of record and the point of enforcement. ArtOfTheHack proposes; the source system acts.
- Cost to the grantee
- KRYOS-XS is provided at no cost to eligible nonprofits under a grant funded by James Scott and administered by the Embassy Row Project.
- Read-only advisory operation by default
- Human approval for high-impact actions
- Least-privilege, revocable permissions
- Explicit blind spots instead of assumed facts
- Reversible enforcement wherever technically available
Product
Where this capability sits
Product 02
KRYOS-XS Console
A centralized Cyber Decision Operations Hub that converts alerts, identity risks, access questions, data exposures and response requirements into one prioritized decision queue.
Adjacent capabilities
Other capabilities in this product
Account-Compromise Assessment
Distinguish legitimate unusual behavior from potential account compromise using available identity evidence.
Access and Entitlement Review
Identify unnecessary, outdated or unusually powerful access and recommend what should change.
Privileged-Access Governance
Understand who holds administrative authority, why it exists, whether it remains necessary and what compromise would cost.
External-Party Access Governance
Decide which external access should be retained, restricted, reviewed or revoked.
OAuth and Automation Authority Governance
Evaluate applications, integrations and automated agents requesting organizational access, before and after the grant.
Guided Incident and Response Workflows
Guide teams through structured response without depending on anyone remembering every step during a crisis.
Board, Funder and Framework Reporting
Turn the accumulated Decision Ledger into clear institutional reporting generated from real decision history.